benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

BIG-Bench Hard / Here comes a perfectly valid argument: First premise: Whatever is ingredient of…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

input

"Here comes a perfectly valid argument: First premise: Whatever is ingredient of Concealer is at least one of these: an ingredient of HEART SHAPED BALM, an ingredient of Goth Fairy or an ingredient of Love Me Like A Wimp. Second premise: Being an ingredient of Clarifying Mask is necessary for being an ingredient of Goth Fairy. Third premise: Being an ingredient of HEART SHAPED BALM is sufficient for being an ingredient of Clarifying Mask. Fourth premise: Every ingredient of Love Me Like A Wimp is an ingredient of Clarifying Mask. So, necessarily, being an ingredient of Concealer is sufficient for being an ingredient of Clarifying Mask."
Is the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?
Options:
- valid 
- invalid

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
d3e112ad-3b08-5de0-a551-6b8a8c2614e4
task_key
formal~5ffallacies--main--d3e112ad-3b08-5de0-a551-6b8a8c2614e4
task_revision_id
1
config / split
formal_fallacies / main

Official source

initial import