benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

BIG-Bench Hard / Here comes a perfectly valid argument: First premise: Being a friend of…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

input

"Here comes a perfectly valid argument: First premise: Being a friend of Kilmarnock FC is sufficient for not being an admirer of The New Saints FC. Second premise: It is false that Maximo is an admirer of The New Saints FC. We may conclude that it is false that Maximo is a friend of Kilmarnock FC."
Is the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?
Options:
- valid 
- invalid

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
d6de8906-6c3a-5660-8fdf-84ba31250242
task_key
formal~5ffallacies--main--d6de8906-6c3a-5660-8fdf-84ba31250242
task_revision_id
1
config / split
formal_fallacies / main

Official source

initial import