benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

BIG-Bench Hard / Here comes a perfectly valid argument: Everyone who is not a frequent consumer…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

input

"Here comes a perfectly valid argument: Everyone who is not a frequent consumer of Kiss My Face soap and not a regular user of Redken shampoo is a regular consumer of Bliss soap or an infrequent user of Shiseido shampoo. Being an owner of a Celtic Sea Salt soap is necessary for being a regular consumer of Bliss soap. Being an infrequent user of Shiseido shampoo is sufficient for being an owner of a Celtic Sea Salt soap. We may conclude: Not being an owner of a Celtic Sea Salt soap is sufficient for being a frequent consumer of Kiss My Face soap or not being a regular user of Redken shampoo."
Is the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?
Options:
- valid 
- invalid

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
d86b7ecc-ba3a-521a-a970-f4cdc6fca56e
task_key
formal~5ffallacies--main--d86b7ecc-ba3a-521a-a970-f4cdc6fca56e
task_revision_id
1
config / split
formal_fallacies / main

Official source

initial import