benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

BIG-Bench Hard / Here comes a perfectly valid argument: Not being an ingredient of Eye Shadow…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

input

"Here comes a perfectly valid argument: Not being an ingredient of Eye Shadow (Gold) is sufficient for not being an ingredient of real fit lipstick 9. Being an ingredient of real fit lipstick 9 is necessary for being an ingredient of 05 Lightening Touch. Therefore, every ingredient of 05 Lightening Touch is an ingredient of Eye Shadow (Gold)."
Is the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?
Options:
- valid 
- invalid

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
f887d666-98ec-5111-b01d-0f96bfc6dae9
task_key
formal~5ffallacies--main--f887d666-98ec-5111-b01d-0f96bfc6dae9
task_revision_id
1
config / split
formal_fallacies / main

Official source

initial import