benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

BIG-Bench Hard / Here comes a perfectly valid argument: First premise: Being an ancestor of Ana…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

input

"Here comes a perfectly valid argument: First premise: Being an ancestor of Ana is sufficient for being a sister of Margie. Second premise: Every schoolmate of Guadalupe is an ancestor of Ana or an aunt of Peggy or a cousin of Diane. Third premise: Everyone who is an aunt of Peggy is a sister of Margie, too. Hence, to be a sister of Margie or a cousin of Diane is necessary for being a schoolmate of Guadalupe."
Is the argument, given the explicitly stated premises, deductively valid or invalid?
Options:
- valid 
- invalid

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

task_id
feb7506d-2c10-50ee-bd20-d0308d108091
task_key
formal~5ffallacies--main--feb7506d-2c10-50ee-bd20-d0308d108091
task_revision_id
1
config / split
formal_fallacies / main

Official source

initial import