benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace
CritPt / Challenge_7_main / Consider a noisy distributed quantum sensing scenario as follows. The quantum…
Problem
Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.
problem description
# Problem setup:
Consider a noisy distributed quantum sensing scenario as follows. The quantum sensor network contains sensor nodes, and each node contains sensor qubits. There is a potentially different parameter to be encoded on each sensor node locally. Our sensing objective is to estimate the scaled average of all local parameters, i.e., supposing that the parameters are , we want to estimate . The quantum network will distribute a -qubit Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state to the sensor nodes, while each sensor node will hold one qubit of the GHZ state. Then each sensor node further performs local entanglement generation between the qubit from the -qubit GHZ state and the remaining sensor qubits. The final state is the initial probe state, which we assume to be an -qubit noisy GHZ state across the quantum sensor network. Suppose that the global GHZ state is in a depolarized form, with GHZ fidelity . Now assume that the noisy sensing dynamics can be described by independent single-qubit Lindblad equations for all sensor qubits: for the -th qubit on the -th node, where is the precession frequency of each qubit sensor on node , and is the single-qubit dephasing rate. In other words, we assume that the dephasing rate is homogeneous across the entire sensor network, while the angular frequency is the same for each qubit on one node but can be generally different between nodes.
# Main problem:
Suppose that the noisy sensing dynamics has duration , and each local parameter is the accumulated phase, i.e. . What is the quantum Fisher information for ? Do not explicitly include and in the final expression. Instead, you may use another variable .
Plain-text mathematical notation (without MathML)
# Problem setup: Consider a noisy distributed quantum sensing scenario as follows. The quantum sensor network contains d sensor nodes, and each node contains n sensor qubits. There is a potentially different parameter to be encoded on each sensor node locally. Our sensing objective is to estimate the scaled average of all d local parameters, i.e., supposing that the parameters are x₁,x₂,…,x_(d), we want to estimate θ₁=(∑_(i=1)^(d)x_(i))/√(d). The quantum network will distribute a d-qubit Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state to the d sensor nodes, while each sensor node will hold one qubit of the GHZ state. Then each sensor node further performs local entanglement generation between the qubit from the d-qubit GHZ state and the remaining n−1 sensor qubits. The final state is the initial probe state, which we assume to be an nd-qubit noisy GHZ state across the quantum sensor network. Suppose that the global GHZ state is in a depolarized form, with GHZ fidelity F(n)=Fk^(n−1). Now assume that the noisy sensing dynamics can be described by independent single-qubit Lindblad equations for all nd sensor qubits: (d)/(dt)ρ=−i(ω^((i)))/(2)[σ_(z)^((i,k)),ρ]+(γ)/(2)(σ_(z)^((i,k))ρσ_(z)^((i,k))−ρ) for the k-th qubit on the i-th node, where ω^((i)) is the precession frequency of each qubit sensor on node i, and γ is the single-qubit dephasing rate. In other words, we assume that the dephasing rate is homogeneous across the entire sensor network, while the angular frequency is the same for each qubit on one node but can be generally different between nodes. # Main problem: Suppose that the noisy sensing dynamics has duration t, and each local parameter is the accumulated phase, i.e. x_(i)=ω^((i))t. What is the quantum Fisher information for θ₁? Do not explicitly include γ and t in the final expression. Instead, you may use another variable q=(1+e^(−γt))/2.
Original LaTeX notation
# Problem setup:
Consider a noisy distributed quantum sensing scenario as follows. The quantum sensor network contains $d$ sensor nodes, and each node contains $n$ sensor qubits. There is a potentially different parameter to be encoded on each sensor node locally. Our sensing objective is to estimate the scaled average of all $d$ local parameters, i.e., supposing that the parameters are $x_1, x_2, \dots, x_d$, we want to estimate $\theta_1 = (\sum_{i=1}^d x_i) / \sqrt{d}$. The quantum network will distribute a $d$-qubit Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state to the $d$ sensor nodes, while each sensor node will hold one qubit of the GHZ state. Then each sensor node further performs local entanglement generation between the qubit from the $d$-qubit GHZ state and the remaining $n-1$ sensor qubits. The final state is the initial probe state, which we assume to be an $nd$-qubit noisy GHZ state across the quantum sensor network. Suppose that the global GHZ state is in a depolarized form, with GHZ fidelity $F(n)=Fk^{n-1}$. Now assume that the noisy sensing dynamics can be described by independent single-qubit Lindblad equations for all $nd$ sensor qubits: $\frac{d}{dt}\rho = -i\frac{\omega^{(i)}}{2}\left[\sigma_z^{(i,k)},\rho\right] + \frac{\gamma}{2}\left(\sigma_z^{(i,k)}\rho \sigma_z^{(i,k)} - \rho\right)$ for the $k$-th qubit on the $i$-th node, where $\omega^{(i)}$ is the precession frequency of each qubit sensor on node $i$, and $\gamma$ is the single-qubit dephasing rate. In other words, we assume that the dephasing rate is homogeneous across the entire sensor network, while the angular frequency is the same for each qubit on one node but can be generally different between nodes.
# Main problem:
Suppose that the noisy sensing dynamics has duration $t$, and each local parameter is the accumulated phase, i.e. $x_i = \omega^{(i)} t$. What is the quantum Fisher information for $\theta_1$? Do not explicitly include $\gamma$ and $t$ in the final expression. Instead, you may use another variable $q = (1 + e^{-\gamma t}) / 2$.code template
Code
import sympy as sp
F, k, n, d, q = sp.symbols('F k n d q')
def answer(F, k, n, d, q):
r"""
Return the expression of the quantum Fisher information for $\theta_1$ in Sympy format.
Inputs
----------
F: sympy.Symbol, initialization fidelity, $F$
k: sympy.Symbol, entangling gate fidelity, $k$
n: sympy.Symbol, qubit number per node, $n$
d: sympy.Symbol, sensor node number, $d$
q: sympy.Symbol, defined by $q = (1 + e^{-\gamma t}) / 2$
Outputs
----------
QFI: sympy.Expr, quantum Fisher information for $\theta_1$
"""
# ------------------ FILL IN YOUR RESULTS BELOW ------------------
QFI = ... # a SymPy expression of inputs
# ---------------------------------------------------------------
return QFIDiscussion
No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.
See answer Answer published by the source
Artifacts
Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.
No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.
Source and history
initial import