benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1019 / A plaintiff was driving her car when she stopped at a red light at an…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A plaintiff was driving her car when she stopped at a red light at an intersection. A defendant, who was behind her, did not see the red light and failed to stop. He crashed into the rear of the woman's car and pushed her onto the curb and into a tree. When the plaintiff got out of her car, she felt fine physically, but was emotionally upset when she saw that the hood and trunk of her car were severely damaged. The next day she received an estimate from the mechanic for $1,950 to repair her car. She consulted an attorney the following afternoon and, that evening, suddenly developed shooting back pains. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant based on a theory of negligence. One day prior to trial, two years after the accident, the plaintiff went to take a photograph of the accident scene. At trial, the photograph is

category

law

options

  1. admissible, if the photograph correctly and accurately portrayed the accident scene.
  2. admissible, if the photograph was taken by a professional photographer.
  3. inadmissible, if the defendant objects, because the photograph was taken two years after the accident.
  4. inadmissible, if the defendant objects, because the photograph does not show the damage to the plaintiff's car.
  5. inadmissible, if the defendant objects, because the photograph might influence the jury's opinion unfairly.
  6. admissible, if the plaintiff can demonstrate that the conditions at the scene of the accident were the same as when the photograph was taken.
  7. admissible, if the plaintiff identifies the photograph at trial.
  8. inadmissible, if the defendant objects, because the photograph was not taken immediately after the accident.
  9. inadmissible, if the defendant objects, because the photograph is non-verbal hearsay.
  10. admissible, if the plaintiff can prove the photograph has not been altered in any way.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1019
task_id
a1b89bf9-24fc-57a7-9956-6bb84d40cf0b
task_key
default--test--1019
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import