benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1021 / A toxicologist employed at the state crime laboratory testifies at a murder…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A toxicologist employed at the state crime laboratory testifies at a murder trial about the autopsy he performed on the victim. His testimony is that he detected traces of succinic acid and choline, the components of succinylcholine, in the victim's brain tissues. Over defense objections, he testified further that, in his opinion, the victim's cause of death was succinylcholine poisoning. On cross-examination, the toxicologist admitted that up until his findings, it had been universally accepted in the medical community that succinylcholine would be undetectable in the brain within a few minutes of its injection. He also admitted that his methods of detecting succinylcholine were experimental and that his results were not presently publishable because they were not complete enough. The defense attorney then makes a motion to strike the toxicologist's testimony regarding the cause of death. The court will most likely

category

law

options

  1. deny the motion, because he was qualified to give an opinion on the ultimate issue of the case.
  2. deny the motion, because the toxicologist's findings were based on his professional expertise.
  3. deny the motion, because the toxicologist was qualified as an expert in medical matters.
  4. deny the motion, because the court values the opinion of the state-employed expert.
  5. grant the motion, because the toxicologist's opinion could not be substantiated.
  6. deny the motion, because the toxicologist's opinion is the only evidence of the cause of death.
  7. grant the motion, because the toxicologist was not properly qualified as an expert.
  8. grant the motion, because the toxicologist admitted his findings contradicted accepted medical knowledge.
  9. grant the motion, because the toxicologist's results were not complete enough to be published.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1021
task_id
37e61dc2-415e-5159-bae3-bd555deb853b
task_key
default--test--1021
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import