benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1031 / A plaintiff sued a utility company that owns a reservoir that is open to the…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A plaintiff sued a utility company that owns a reservoir that is open to the public for recreation pursuant to a license from a federal agency. The plaintiff was severely injured in the reservoir when he dove from a boat into what he thought was deep water and hit an unmarked submerged island. The plaintiff alleges that the company was negligent in failing to mark the submerged island. At trial, the plaintiff has called an engineer and qualified him as plaintiff has called an engineer and qualified him as an expert in managing reservoirs. Which of the following opinions by the plaintiff's expert is the court most likely to admit?

category

law

options

  1. "The plaintiff could have avoided the accident if he was more cautious."
  2. "The plaintiff was not contributorily negligent."
  3. "The accident probably occurred in the manner shown by this computer-animated film I made."
  4. "The company's negligence is a result of poor management."
  5. "The company could have marked the island in a day and at a cost of $300."
  6. "The company was required by federal law to mark the island."
  7. "The federal agency is responsible for this accident."
  8. "The company is responsible for all accidents in the reservoir."
  9. "The company was not required by federal law to mark the island."

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1031
task_id
d1152cca-7cce-5cd2-93e0-941f4fa0df67
task_key
default--test--1031
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import