benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 10784 / According to Reiman, van den Haag's arguments in favor of the death penalty

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

 According to Reiman, van den Haag's arguments in favor of the death penalty

category

philosophy

options

  1. are not based on logical reasoning.
  2. are flawed due to lack of empirical evidence.
  3. contradict the principles of human rights.
  4. follow common sense.
  5. are based on biased principles.
  6. should be accepted.
  7. prove that torture is morally impermissible.
  8. are based on the concept of retribution.
  9. promote the idea of capital punishment.
  10. are incompatible with the right to retaliation.

src

ori_mmlu-moral_disputes

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import