benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 10803 / If you argued something is flawed because it fails to do something, when it was…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

If you argued something is flawed because it fails to do something, when it was never intended to do that, you may have committed which of the following fallacies?

category

philosophy

options

  1. ad ignorantium
  2. Many questions
  3. Extension
  4. Compound proposition

src

ori_mmlu-logical_fallacies

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import