benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 10836 / The _ad nauseam_ fallacy is

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

The _ad nauseam_ fallacy is

category

philosophy

options

  1. reasoning that a conclusion is false because it's been claimed so rarely
  2. reasoning that a claim is true because it hasn't been disproven
  3. arguing that an act should be carried out because it will not have any significant consequences, when there is no evidence of the effects
  4. arguing that a conclusion is true because it's been disproven so often
  5. arguing that something should be done because that's the way it's been done in the past.
  6. reasoning that a conclusion is true because it's been claimed so often
  7. reasoning that a claim is false because so many people believe it is false
  8. arguing that an act should be avoided because it will have significant consequences, when there is no evidence of the effects
  9. reasoning that a claim is true because so many people believe it is true
  10. arguing that something should not be done because it's never been done in the past

src

ori_mmlu-logical_fallacies

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
10836
task_id
52508bfd-1430-52d1-96da-d8523917fa7f
task_key
default--test--10836
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import