benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 10865 / Hourdequin argues that one flaw of consequentialist calculation is that

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

 Hourdequin argues that one flaw of consequentialist calculation is that

category

philosophy

options

  1. it negates the notion that individuals are inherently self-interested actors.
  2. it can run counter to the idea that persons are atomistic and individually rational actors.
  3. it overlooks the potential conflict between individual and collective interests.
  4. it can run counter to a person's being able to integrate her commitments at various levels.
  5. it fails to reconcile prima facie duties.
  6. it doesn't consider the potential of individuals to act against their own self-interest.
  7. it undermines the importance of personal values and beliefs in decision-making.
  8. it disregards the impact of social norms on individual decision-making.
  9. it fails to recognize that possibility that the persons are best understood in relation to one another.
  10. it discredits the notion that individuals can make morally autonomous decisions.

src

ori_mmlu-moral_disputes

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import