benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 10907 / If it were known that a policy would wipe out several animal species without…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

 If it were known that a policy would wipe out several animal species without negatively affecting human beings, Baxter would most likely say that

category

philosophy

options

  1. this policy is morally problematic because it disrupts the natural order.
  2. this policy is morally problematic because it negatively impacts biodiversity.
  3. this policy is morally acceptable because it does not harm human beings.
  4. this policy is morally unproblematic.
  5. this policy is morally obligatory because it prioritizes human beings.
  6. this policy is morally unacceptable because it eliminates several animal species.
  7. this policy is morally obligatory because the environment ought not to exist.
  8. this policy is morally problematic because it damages the integrity of the ecosystem.
  9. this policy is morally problematic because it harms the environment.

src

ori_mmlu-moral_disputes

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import