benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 10914 / Carens's main conclusion is that

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

 Carens's main conclusion is that

category

philosophy

options

  1. liberal egalitarian objections to anticosmopolitanism do not succeed.
  2. Carens believes that liberal egalitarianism supports closed borders and strict immigration policies.
  3. Carens argues that liberal egalitarianism is rooted in anti-immigration sentiments.
  4. egalitarianism is founded on sentiments of envy and is therefore unjustified.
  5. Carens concludes that liberal egalitarianism inherently supports anti-cosmopolitanism.
  6. Carens concludes that egalitarianism is a justifiable sentiment, irrespective of immigration policies.
  7. Carens asserts that liberal egalitarianism does not have a clear stance on immigration policies.
  8. liberal egalitarianism should almost always press for more openness toward immigrants and refugees.
  9. liberal egalitarianism, contrary to appearances, entails that only closed border immigration policies are acceptable.
  10. Carens suggests that liberal egalitarianism always supports the concept of open borders.

src

ori_mmlu-moral_disputes

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import