benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 10919 / Instead of asking why the act of destroying the environment might be immoral,…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

 Instead of asking why the act of destroying the environment might be immoral, Hill wants to ask

category

philosophy

options

  1. how the decision to preserve the environment benefits the environment.
  2. how the destruction of the environment affects the economy.
  3. why people who preserve the environment might be good people.
  4. how destroying the environment affects future generations.
  5. why the act of destroying nature might be immoral.
  6. whether plants have interests.
  7. why people who destroy the environment might be bad people.
  8. if destroying the environment is legally punishable.
  9. whether nature has a right to exist.
  10. whether animals have rights.

src

ori_mmlu-moral_disputes

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
10919
task_id
10826a27-313e-55c2-adfd-169c41c7afde
task_key
default--test--10919
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import