benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 10956 / In response to the argument that embryos are not persons because they lack…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

 In response to the argument that embryos are not persons because they lack certain rights that all persons have (such as the right to life), Lee and George argue that

category

philosophy

options

  1. the right to life belongs to all living creatures, human or not.
  2. the right to life belongs to a human being at all times that he or she exists.
  3. only beings capable of experiencing pain should be given the right to life.
  4. the right to life is not a relevant concept when discussing embryos.
  5. the right to life applies only to beings capable of thought and self-awareness.
  6. embryos have potential personhood and therefore should be given the right to life.
  7. not all persons have the right to life-for example, a murderer has given up his or her right to life through his or her actions
  8. all of the above
  9. the right to life does not apply to embryos because they are not independent beings.
  10. the right to life is granted at birth and not before.

src

ori_mmlu-moral_disputes

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import