benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 11000 / In response to the argument that embryos are not persons because they do not…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

 In response to the argument that embryos are not persons because they do not exercise higher mental capacities, Lee and George argue that

category

philosophy

options

  1. it doesn't make sense to say that a person exercises higher mental capacities.
  2. mental capacities should not be a factor in determining personhood.
  3. the ability to exercise higher mental capacities could be considered a potential, not an actuality.
  4. to have killed a human embryos that developed into you would have been the same thing as killing you.
  5. embryos actually do exercise higher mental capacities.
  6. higher mental capacities are not the only defining characteristics of a person.
  7. they dispute the notion that higher mental capacities are a requirement for personhood.
  8. the argument is irrelevant as they believe life begins at conception.
  9. embryos are potential persons and therefore should have the same rights.
  10. the argument is sound, but its validity fails due to a common logical fallacy.

src

ori_mmlu-moral_disputes

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import