benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 11003 / The question of whether the killing/letting die distinction is morally relevant…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

 The question of whether the killing/letting die distinction is morally relevant can be posed by asking whether we are equally to blame for allowing people in Third World countries to starve as we would be for

category

philosophy

options

  1. killing them by blocking access to clean water.
  2. killing them by sending poisoned food.
  3. refusing to share agricultural technology with them.
  4. withholding medicine that they need to survive.
  5. exploiting their resources without fair compensation.
  6. denying them the opportunity to trade fairly in global markets.
  7. depriving them of knowledge they need to produce food.
  8. imposing economic sanctions that lead to food shortages.
  9. depriving them of their land for farming.
  10. refusing to give them the money they need to purchase food.

src

ori_mmlu-moral_disputes

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
11003
task_id
0d9abd46-298b-578a-864f-1c265f119df9
task_key
default--test--11003
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import