benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 11014 / Which of the following is the best explanation of the fallacy of loaded…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

Which of the following is the best explanation of the fallacy of loaded language?

category

philosophy

options

  1. Using complex or technical language to make an argument seem more credible or sophisticated than it actually is.
  2. Using language that appeals to the audience's prejudices or biases to win an argument, rather than relying on logical reasoning.
  3. Using language that is intentionally misleading or deceptive to convince the audience of a particular point of view.
  4. Using language that is overly formal or academic to intimidate the audience and discourage them from questioning the argument.
  5. Using language and punctuation in a way that a statement can have multiple interpretations, so it's not really clear what is meant.
  6. Using language that is overly emotional or dramatic to distract from the lack of substantive evidence or logical reasoning.
  7. Using language that is intentionally vague or ambiguous to obscure the truth or mislead the audience.
  8. Confusing figurative language with literal language
  9. Using emotionally charged language to create an impression about the subject of a claim, without making an argument that the language fits the subject.
  10. Referring to an act committed by an opponent in negative terms while referring to the same act committed by the arguer or supporters in favorable terms.

src

ori_mmlu-logical_fallacies

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
11014
task_id
fef86afb-085e-5a6b-b7ea-9120e01678ea
task_key
default--test--11014
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import