benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 11019 / Wolf claims that interpreting Kant’s ethics so that it consists of a finite set…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

Wolf claims that interpreting Kant’s ethics so that it consists of a finite set of constraints:

category

philosophy

options

  1. contradicts the basic principles of Kantian ethics.
  2. simplifies the complexity of Kantian ethics.
  3. transforms the theory into a form of contractarianism.
  4. makes it too lenient and flexible.
  5. yields an unattractive picture of moral sainthood.
  6. distorts the fundamental nature of the theory.
  7. makes the theory too abstract and impractical.
  8. implausibly places an “upper bound” on moral worthiness.
  9. yields a theory that is too demanding.
  10. results in a philosophical dilemma.

src

ori_mmlu-philosophy

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
11019
task_id
14e9d72f-877b-5a6e-b364-922d1feaa84e
task_key
default--test--11019
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import