benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 11042 / Richardson-Self argues that sexist speech

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

 Richardson-Self argues that sexist speech

category

philosophy

options

  1. Can never be considered hate speech regardless of context
  2. Is never hate speech because it is a form of free expression.
  3. is always hate speech, because it does not involves violence.
  4. is not always hate speech, because it does not involve violence
  5. is always hate speech, because it involves violence.
  6. Is not hate speech because it is protected under freedom of speech
  7. Is always hate speech because it promotes gender inequality
  8. Is only hate speech when it directly incites violence
  9. Can be considered hate speech when it promotes discrimination
  10. I s not always hate speech, because it always involves violence.

src

ori_mmlu-moral_disputes

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
11042
task_id
c359f181-0ea8-59a4-9bd3-7bd7a880d41a
task_key
default--test--11042
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import