benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1105 / A supermarket had just reopened after a two- week closing for renovations. On…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A supermarket had just reopened after a two- week closing for renovations. On the morning of the reopening, a woman was shopping when she suddenly fell and suffered a broken leg. Thereafter, the woman sued the supermarket for personal injuries. In her suit, the woman claimed that she tripped over a paint bucket that had been lying in one of the aisles. At trial, the woman called another customer to testify that while he was shopping he heard a thud, turned around and saw the woman fall on the floor. He also testified that he saw an empty paint bucket lying a few feet from the woman's leg. On cross- examination, the customer got into an argumentative exchange with the supermarket's attorney. When asked his opinion of what caused the woman's fall, the customer testified, "She fell because she tripped on the bucket. " He admitted on cross-examination, however, that he didn't actually see the woman trip on the bucket. The supermarket's attorney then asked the customer the following question:"If you didn't see the woman trip on the bucket, how do you know that she fell because of it?" The customer answered, "Because my girlfriend who was shopping with me told me later that she saw the woman trip over the bucket. "The supermarket's attorney moves to strike the customer's last answer. If the trial judge overrules the defendant's motion and permits the customer's answer to stand, it will most likely be because

category

law

options

  1. the customer's answer was based on a reliable source.
  2. the customer's answer was invited by the supermarket's attorney's question.
  3. the customer's answer was a lay opinion.
  4. the customer's answer was an excited utterance.
  5. the customer's answer was a statement of recent perception.
  6. the customer's answer was based on firsthand knowledge.
  7. the customer's answer was a present sense impression.
  8. the customer's answer was a spontaneous statement.
  9. the customer's answer was relevant to the case.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1105
task_id
ced6056e-94d0-529a-bb4c-2a147e53b8b1
task_key
default--test--1105
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import