benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 11085 / Against Kant's view of sexual objectification, Papadaki argues that

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

 Against Kant's view of sexual objectification, Papadaki argues that

category

philosophy

options

  1. Papadaki actually agrees with Kant's view
  2. Papadaki suggests that Kant's view of sexual objectification is too subjective.
  3. Papadaki argues that sexual objectification is an outdated concept.
  4. sexual objectification actually enhances humanity.
  5. Papadaki believes that sexual objectification is a necessary part of human relationships.
  6. Papadaki argues that Kant's view of sexual objectification is too moralistic.
  7. According to Papadaki, Kant's views on sexual objectification are too black and white.
  8. Papadaki holds that sexual objectification can be justified in certain contexts.
  9. Kant is wrong to think about the wrong of sexual objectification in terms of humanity.
  10. it is not clear how sexual use sacrifices humanity.

src

ori_mmlu-moral_disputes

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
11085
task_id
97602c38-b1a6-5e9c-b2c3-8ea3af7e7176
task_key
default--test--11085
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import