benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 11141 / In a conditional syllogism, when the minor premise denies the antecedent

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

In a conditional syllogism, when the minor premise denies the antecedent

category

philosophy

options

  1. no valid conclusion can be drawn
  2. the conclusion must affirm the antecedent
  3. the conclusion must be a tautology
  4. the conclusion must affirm the consequent
  5. the conclusion must be an inverse statement
  6. the conclusion must be a conditional statement
  7. the conclusion must be a converse statement
  8. the conclusion must deny the consequent
  9. the conclusion must be a contradiction
  10. the conclusion must deny the antecedent

src

ori_mmlu-logical_fallacies

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
11141
task_id
d60206c1-b640-517e-9dd5-11b3071d50ed
task_key
default--test--11141
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import