benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 11172 / The _post hoc_ fallacy is

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

The _post hoc_ fallacy is

category

philosophy

options

  1. arguing that since one event preceded another event the first event must have caused the second event
  2. drawing a conclusion about a causal relationship when there is no evidence of a causal relationship
  3. arguing that since two things happened at the same time one must have caused the other
  4. arguing that a single event caused another when there is no logical connection between them
  5. drawing a conclusion about a causal relationship based on a single instance
  6. arguing that an event must have caused another because they are correlated
  7. arguing that a single event caused another when the cause is really several events
  8. drawing a conclusion about a causal relationship based on hearsay or anecdotal evidence
  9. arguing that since two events are unrelated, one cannot have caused the other

src

ori_mmlu-logical_fallacies

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
11172
task_id
5dd4ac72-a35f-586d-9580-8706b7c45e35
task_key
default--test--11172
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import