benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 11247 / Which of the following explanations best fits the fallacy of ignorance of…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

Which of the following explanations best fits the fallacy of ignorance of refutation?

category

philosophy

options

  1. asserting an argumentative opponent has taken an easily defeated position, which the opponent has not really taken, defeating the position, and acting as if you've done significant damage to that person's overall argument.
  2. causing confusion during refutation because of a real or feigned lack of the ability to engage in refutation
  3. characterizing an opposing argument in such a way to make it or its consequences appear to be ridiculous
  4. arguing an action should be taken based only on the need to be loyal to someone or to a group

src

ori_mmlu-logical_fallacies

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
11247
task_id
82e3b9dc-5850-509e-8797-42eb093842c1
task_key
default--test--11247
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import