benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 11251 / How does Stevenson respond to the objection that his theory does not account for…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

How does Stevenson respond to the objection that his theory does not account for the kind of goodness that is objective and is known a priori?

category

philosophy

options

  1. He claims he does not understand such a property.
  2. He claims that his theory is still in the process of development.
  3. None of the above.
  4. He claims to have proven that such a property does not exist.
  5. He claims that the objection is irrelevant to his theory.
  6. He claims that such a property is subjective, not objective.
  7. He claims that the objection is based on a misunderstanding.
  8. He claims to have offered an account of just such a property.
  9. He does not respond to the objection.
  10. He claims that his theory does account for this kind of goodness.

src

ori_mmlu-philosophy

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
11251
task_id
6e0d6dec-c3fe-5f4d-97fb-db3769debb6a
task_key
default--test--11251
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import