benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1155 / A man entered into a franchise contract with a company to operate a fast-food…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A man entered into a franchise contract with a company to operate a fast-food restaurant in a city. The company's national headquarters is located in another state. After the contract was executed, the man leased a store in a shopping center where he planned to open his restaurant. City public officials, however, refused to grant the man the necessary food vendor's license despite the fact that he could prove that his restaurant complied with all provisions of the municipal licensing ordinance. Section 1287 of the city food vending ordinance provides, in part, that "a food vendor's license shall be issued to any applicant who properly complies with all of the health requirements of this ordinance. " After the man's application for a food vendor's license was rejected, he requested a hearing to establish his qualifications. City officials refused this request and also declined to give any reason for his license denial. Which of the following is the strongest constitutional argument that the man may use to challenge the refusal of the city officials to grant him a food vendor's license?

category

law

options

  1. The city action infringes on his right to property without just compensation.
  2. The city action is a violation of his First Amendment rights.
  3. The city action is a breach of his Fourth Amendment rights.
  4. The city action denies him the right to work under the Thirteenth Amendment.
  5. The city action violates his right to fair trial.
  6. The city action constitutes an undue burden on the potential interstate commerce between the man and his out-of-state franchisor.
  7. The city action denies him procedural due process.
  8. The city action is an infringement on his right to equal protection under the law.
  9. The city action impairs the obligation of the man's contract with the franchising company and his rental agreement with the shopping mall.
  10. The city action denies him substantive due process by arbitrarily regulating economic activity.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1155
task_id
a66bdfc9-2b00-572a-a1ac-0830e5a8eff8
task_key
default--test--1155
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import