benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1172 / A student at a private university sued the university in fed-eral court for…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A student at a private university sued the university in fed-eral court for negligence after he fell from scaffolding in a university-owned theater building. At trial, after briefing from both parties, the court permitted the jury to hear testimony that there had been several previous accidents in the same building. The jury found for the student, and the university appealed. One of the university's arguments on appeal is that the testimony about the previous accidents should have been excluded as irrelevant and highly prejudicial. Which standard of review applies to this argument?

category

law

options

  1. Abuse of discretion.
  2. Probable cause.
  3. Harmless error.
  4. Preponderance of the evidence.
  5. Inevitable discovery.
  6. Manifest injustice.
  7. Fair and reasonable.
  8. De novo.
  9. Substantial evidence.
  10. Clearly erroneous.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1172
task_id
0ec4dadd-2df4-5c6a-bd76-834c1bee2cfc
task_key
default--test--1172
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import