benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1179 / A wife was divorced from her husband. The wife and the husband had a daughter…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A wife was divorced from her husband. The wife and the husband had a daughter who was 12 years of age. The daughter lived with the wife, but the husband frequently visited his daughter at her house. One morning, the husband came to his ex-wife's home to see his daughter. He and his daughter were outside on the patio chatting when the wife noticed her ex-husband's briefcase lying on the kitchen floor. The husband had entered the house carrying his briefcase, which he placed down before going out to see his daughter on the patio. Seeing the briefcase, the wife decided to open it. Inside she found a large envelope. She decided to keep it, thinking it contained money. Later that night after her ex-husband left, she opened the envelope and found a large amount of cocaine. The wife called the police who came and confiscated the drugs. The husband was subsequently charged with possession of cocaine. The husband has filed a motion to exclude the cocaine from being introduced into evidence. His motion should be

category

law

options

  1. granted, because the police failed to secure a search warrant before the seizure of the cocaine.
  2. denied, because the wife had the right to open the briefcase left in her house.
  3. denied, because the husband left the briefcase in the kitchen in plain view.
  4. denied, because the police were called after the cocaine was found.
  5. denied, because the husband had no reasonable expectation of privacy at his ex-wife's home.
  6. denied, because the initial seizure was made by a private individual.
  7. granted, because the cocaine was found in his personal briefcase.
  8. granted, because the husband did not give consent for the briefcase to be opened.
  9. granted, because the wife had no right to open the briefcase without the husband's permission.
  10. granted, because the seizure violated the husband's right of privacy.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1179
task_id
d5d00547-d374-5107-8bc3-46f8bfdf6008
task_key
default--test--1179
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import