benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1268 / An employee wdrked as a delivery person for a drugstore. As part of the…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

An employee wdrked as a delivery person for a drugstore. As part of the employee's duties and responsibilities, he would regularly deliver prescriptions and other items (such as toiletries, cosmetics, vitamins, and gift products) to customers. One afternoon while the employee was on duty, he remembered that it was his girlfriend's birthday. He went ahead and bought her a bottle of perfume from the pharmacy's cosmetics department. The employee paid the full price of $79. 95 for the perfume and had the perfume gift wrapped. He then drove to the girlfriend's house in the company van to personally deliver the birthday present. This trip took place during the employee's regular working hours while he was en route to make another delivery from his van. As he was traveling to the girlfriend's house, he was in such a hurry that he drove through a red light and collided with a vehicle owned and operated by a driver. The driver, who had entered the intersection on the green light, tried unsuccessfully to swerve and stop but was unable to avoid the employee's vehicle. The driver was injured in the accident, which caused extensive damage to both vehicles. If the driver brings suit against the drugstore to recover damages arising from the accident, the driver will probably

category

law

options

  1. prevail, because the employee was using the company van at the time of the accident.
  2. not prevail, because the employee paid for the perfume with his own money.
  3. prevail, because the driver had the right of way at the time of the accident.
  4. prevail, because the employee was under the control and direction of the drugstore at the time of the accident.
  5. not prevail, because the employee was personally responsible for the accident.
  6. not prevail, because the drugstore did not directly cause the accident.
  7. not prevail, because the drugstore was not negligent in hiring the employee.
  8. prevail, because the employee was on duty at the time of the accident.
  9. not prevail, because the employee was acting outside the scope of the employment relationship at the time of the accident.
  10. prevail, because the employee paid for the perfume.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1268
task_id
e7d4d841-f16f-5500-98ff-64b3c913d303
task_key
default--test--1268
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import