benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1269 / A highway patrol officer stopped a driver for speeding and found that the person…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A highway patrol officer stopped a driver for speeding and found that the person had a suspended license. He allowed her husband to drive the car home but arrested her for driving under suspension. After securing her inside the squad car, he conducted a search of her vehicle. The officer found a bag of cocaine inside a zippered jacket on the back seat. He arrested her for possession and possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance. Prior to trial, the driver moved for suppression of the cocaine. Is it likely that the trial court will grant the suppression motion?

category

law

options

  1. Yes, the motion will be granted because a search of a vehicle requires a search warrant unless there are exceptional exigent circumstances.
  2. Yes, the motion will be granted because the officer did not have the driver's consent to search the car.
  3. No, the motion will be denied because the officer had the right to search the car for officer safety reasons.
  4. No, the motion will be denied because the officer had a reasonable suspicion to search the car due to the driver's suspended license.
  5. No, the motion will be denied because the officer had probable cause to search the car after finding out about the suspended license.
  6. No, the motion will be denied because this was a valid search incident to an arrest.
  7. Yes, it must be suppressed because she was secured in the squad car and the police could not expect to find evidence relating to the current arrest in the car.
  8. Yes, the motion will be granted because the cocaine was found in a personal item, not in plain sight.
  9. No, the motion will be denied because there is no expectation of privacy toward property inside one's car.
  10. Yes, the motion will be granted because the officer did not have a warrant to search the jacket on the back seat.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1269
task_id
6ed45f5d-c014-56e5-b519-39a9c0d7ec45
task_key
default--test--1269
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import