benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1287 / Which of the following criticisms of Llewellyn's distinction between the grand…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

Which of the following criticisms of Llewellyn's distinction between the grand and formal styles of legal reasoning is the most compelling?

category

law

options

  1. The distinction is too simplistic to capture the complexity of legal reasoning.
  2. It overemphasizes the role of judges while ignoring the role of juries.
  3. Judges are appointed to interpret the law, not to make it.
  4. It is misleading to pigeon-hole judges in this way.
  5. Legal reasoning is always grand.
  6. It does not consider the role of precedent in legal reasoning.
  7. Llewellyn's distinction lacks empirical evidence.
  8. The distinction does not take into account the influence of personal biases.
  9. There is no distinction between the two forms of legal reasoning.
  10. Judicial reasoning is always formal.

src

ori_mmlu-jurisprudence

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import