benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1291 / Bill purchased a can of Sipep from the Ajax Minimart. After he finished drinking…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

Bill purchased a can of Sipep from the Ajax Minimart. After he finished drinking the Sipep, Bill noticed that the can contained dead insects stuck on the inside bottom of the can. In a strict product liability tort action against Ajax, Bill must prove, among other things, that:

category

law

options

  1. Ajax failed to warn Bill about the potential for insects in the Sipep can.
  2. Ajax had prior notice of other similar problems with Sipep products.
  3. Ajax actually placed the dead insects into the can.
  4. The insects in the can caused Bill physical harm.
  5. Ajax is a merchant selling Sipep.
  6. Ajax knew or should have known of the defective condition
  7. The Sipep can was sealed when Bill purchased it.
  8. Bill consumed the entire can of Sipep before noticing the defects.
  9. Ajax had a duty to inspect each can of Sipep before selling it.
  10. Ajax is the manufacturer of the Sipep.

src

ori_mmlu-jurisprudence

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1291
task_id
fc9eb69e-957b-5ad3-acf2-8a65461a2430
task_key
default--test--1291
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import