benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1322 / A longshoreman fell to his death through an open hatch on the deck of a ship.…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A longshoreman fell to his death through an open hatch on the deck of a ship. The longshoreman was an employee of a company that had contracted with the ship's owner to load and unload the ship. The fall occurred at night, when loading work was over for the day, and there was no reason for the longshoreman to have been near the hatch. A negligence action was filed against the ship's owner for the death of the longshoreman. In that action, the owner has moved for summary judgment and has provided unrebutted evidence that it is customary for the crews of ships to open the hatches for ventilation after the longshoremen have left the ships. How should the court respond to the motion?

category

law

options

  1. Deny the motion and submit the case to the jury with instructions that the ship's owner is liable if the hatch was left open irresponsibly.
  2. Grant the motion, because the custom should be considered conclusive on the issue of negligence.
  3. Grant the motion, because it is customary for the crews to open the hatches for ventilation after the longshoremen have left the ship.
  4. Deny the motion and submit the case to the jury with instructions that the ship's owner should win if the longshoreman was improperly near the hatch.
  5. Deny the motion, because the probability of serious injury caused by falling down an open hatch clearly outweighs the burden of keeping the hatch closed.
  6. Grant the motion, as the longshoreman was an employee of a different company and the ship's owner can't be held responsible for his whereabouts.
  7. Deny the motion, because the ship's owner should have ensured that all hatches were closed after the longshoremen had left the ship.
  8. Grant the motion, because there was no reason for the longshoreman to have been near the hatch.
  9. Deny the motion and submit the case to the jury with instructions that the custom is relevant but not conclusive on the issue of negligence.
  10. Deny the motion and submit the case to the jury with instructions that the custom is irrelevant to the issue of negligence.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1322
task_id
d2bc0f44-1b5f-5fa5-be2d-55abf9577214
task_key
default--test--1322
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import