benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1328 / Police officers had probable cause to believe that a man had committed a series…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

Police officers had probable cause to believe that a man had committed a series of armed bank robberies with an accomplice. The officers obtained a valid arrest warrant for the man and went to his house to arrest him. The officers found the front door ajar and could hear a radio playing inside. They knocked on the door, identified themselves as police officers, and stated that they had a warrant. Getting no response, the officers entered the house. After the officers called the man's name several times and again identified themselves as police officers, the man emerged from the basement and was arrested. The officers went into the basement to look for the accomplice. They opened a closet door and found cocaine in plain view. They did not find the accomplice. The man was indicted for cocaine possession. He has moved to suppress the cocaine as evidence on the ground that it was obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Should the court grant the motion to suppress?

category

law

options

  1. No, because the officers discovered the cocaine during a lawful protective sweep of the house looking for the man's accomplice.
  2. Yes, because the man was not given a chance to surrender before the officers entered the house.
  3. Yes, because the officers did not find the accomplice in the house.
  4. No, because the officers had a valid arrest warrant for the man.
  5. Yes, because the officers entered the house without permission.
  6. Yes, because the officers did not have probable cause to believe that cocaine would be in the closet.
  7. No, because the search was incident to the man's arrest.
  8. No, because the officers had probable cause to believe that the man was involved in criminal activity.
  9. No, because the cocaine was in plain view when the officers opened the closet.
  10. Yes, because the officers did not have a search warrant.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1328
task_id
75b5822a-0a82-5d68-89f8-6b95a0827e43
task_key
default--test--1328
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import