benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1429 / An engineer signed a two-year contract to serve as the chief safety engineer for…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

An engineer signed a two-year contract to serve as the chief safety engineer for a coal mine at a salary of $7,000 per month. The position required the engineer to work underground each workday. After one week on the job, the engineer became very ill. He requested testing of the mine air system, which revealed the presence of a chemical agent to which the engineer had a rare allergic reaction. The engineer promptly quit. The coal mine then hired a qualified replacement for the remainder of the engineer's contract at a salary of $7,500 per month. Assume that no statute or regulation applies. If the coal mine sues the engineer for breach of contract, is the coal mine likely to recover damages?
Plain-text mathematical notation (without MathML)
An engineer signed a two-year contract to serve as the chief safety engineer for a coal mine at a salary of $7,000 per month. The position required the engineer to work underground each workday. After one week on the job, the engineer became very ill. He requested testing of the mine air system, which revealed the presence of a chemical agent to which the engineer had a rare allergic reaction. The engineer promptly quit. The coal mine then hired a qualified replacement for the remainder of the engineer's contract at a salary of $7,500 per month. Assume that no statute or regulation applies. If the coal mine sues the engineer for breach of contract, is the coal mine likely to recover damages?
Original LaTeX notation
An engineer signed a two-year contract to serve as the chief safety engineer for a coal mine at a salary of $7,000 per month. The position required the engineer to work underground each workday. After one week on the job, the engineer became very ill. He requested testing of the mine air system, which revealed the presence of a chemical agent to which the engineer had a rare allergic reaction. The engineer promptly quit. The coal mine then hired a qualified replacement for the remainder of the engineer's contract at a salary of $7,500 per month. Assume that no statute or regulation applies. If the coal mine sues the engineer for breach of contract, is the coal mine likely to recover damages?

category

law

options

  1. No, because the risk to the engineer's health excused his nonperformance of the contract.
  2. Yes, because the coal mine suffered a financial loss due to the higher salary of the replacement.
  3. No, because an at-will employee has the right to terminate an employment contract.
  4. Yes, because the mine is reasonably safe for most people.
  5. Yes, because the coal mine had no knowledge of the engineer's allergy.
  6. No, because the engineer was not aware of his allergy at the time of contract signing.
  7. No, because the engineer had a valid reason for quitting the job.
  8. Yes, because the engineer failed to fulfill the contract obligation.
  9. No, because the presence of the chemical agent made the work environment unsafe for the engineer.
  10. Yes, because the coal mine acted in good faith in mitigating the effect of the engineer's failure to finish the contract term.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import