benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1449 / A women's action group attempted for many months, unsuccessfully, to reach an…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A women's action group attempted for many months, unsuccessfully, to reach an agreement with the local professional men's club to admit women to membership. The women's group instituted a suit for a declaratory judgment in federal court to determine whether the men's club was subject to the state's anti-discrimination act. Prior to the elections for city officials, four members of the women's group were sent to picket the offices of the mayor and district attorney, both prominent members of the men's club. Two members walked outside the front of the mayor's office building, carrying signs that read, "The mayor is supposed to serve all the people but his lunch club is for men ONLY. So don't vote for him. " The other two pickets walked outside the rear of the district attorney's office building, carrying similar signs, telling the public not to vote for him. This picketing was carried on from 9 A. M. to 5 P. M. The same day, two more pickets were assigned to carry identical signs in front of the mayor's official residence. Two pickets also carried duplicate signs in front of the district attorney's suburban home during the early evening hours. The picketing at all sites was held peacefully without any disturbance. The relevant city ordinances concerning picketing read as follows:"Section 201. No picketing shall be permitted inside of, or on any sidewalk or street immediately adjacent or contiguous to, city hall, without express permission of the mayor. Applications for such permission shall be filed at least three days before such picketing is intended to begin and shall state the purpose, place, and time of the proposed picketing. Section 202. It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in picketing before or about the residence of an individual. Nothing herein shall be deemed to prohibit the holding of a meeting or assembly on any premises used for the discussion of subjects of general public interest. "The federal district court will most likely avoid making a decision on the merits of the suit for declaratory judgment because

category

law

options

  1. the women's group lacks standing.
  2. the women's group has not exhausted all other legal remedies.
  3. the federal court does not have jurisdiction over state laws.
  4. the men's club is not a public entity.
  5. the women's group did not obtain the mayor's permission for picketing.
  6. the picketing does not violate the city ordinances.
  7. the relief sought is essentially for an advisory opinion.
  8. there is no case or controversy.
  9. the case lacks adequate ripeness.
  10. the picketing was peaceful and did not cause any disturbance.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1449
task_id
30a0b2c6-0c17-5c31-bf5b-328e43d1c49a
task_key
default--test--1449
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import