benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1505 / After having several drinks in a bar, a man and his friend drove by a large home…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

After having several drinks in a bar, a man and his friend drove by a large home with its lights out. With the man sitting in the passenger seat, the friend pulled the car over. They were feeling drunk and aggressive from the drinks. After discussing it, they decided it was a safe bet to enter the home and see what they could take. They broke in and took several bags of jewelry. While driving away, they were stopped and arrested for burglary. The passenger used the defense that he was too intoxicated to form the specific intent to enter the home for the purpose of committing a felony therein. Do the facts described here indicate that the defense will likely prevail at a trial on the merits?

category

law

options

  1. Yes, because the alcohol impaired his judgment, making it impossible for him to make a rational decision.
  2. No, because intoxication is never a defense to the commission of a felony.
  3. Yes, because the feeling of being drunk and aggressive were not his natural mental state and therefore mens rea was defeated.
  4. No, because they had the intent to commit the crime before they even entered the home.
  5. Yes, because he was in fact too intoxicated to form the intent needed to prove burglary.
  6. Yes, because he was the passenger and not the driver, thus was not directly involved in the act.
  7. No, because the act of discussing and deciding to commit the act shows intent, regardless of intoxication.
  8. No, because being intoxicated does not diminish the fact that a felony was committed.
  9. No, because the facts indicate that he wasn't too intoxicated to form the necessary intent for burglary.
  10. Yes, because he was under the influence of alcohol and therefore cannot be held responsible for his actions.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1505
task_id
0c19a638-cb3e-520f-b484-203a3dd73ac4
task_key
default--test--1505
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import