benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1515 / At 10:00p. m. onNovember 14, a driver was operating his automobile along Main…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

At 10:00p. m. onNovember 14, a driver was operating his automobile along Main Street. As the driver was approaching the intersection of Main Street and First Avenue, a motorist, who was driving straight through a red light, suddenly appeared before him. Trying to avoid the motorist, the driver veered his car onto the sidewalk. The car landed in a deep hole in the sidewalk. This hole had been dug by a construction company, which had been repairing a water main break earlier in the day. The construction company had been hired by the local municipal water department. Although the' construction company had erected a warning sign advising pedestrians about the hole, there was no fence or barrier surrounding it. When the driver's car fell into the hole, it ruptured the water main, engulfing the car with water. Within a short time, the driver, unable to escape, drowned in his car, which rapidly filled with water. In a wrongful death action by the driver's estate against the municipal water department, the estate will most probably

category

law

options

  1. not prevail, because the municipal water department would not be liable for the negligence of its independent contractor.
  2. not prevail, because the driver was negligent for driving onto the sidewalk.
  3. prevail, as the municipal water department is responsible for the safe operation of its contractors.
  4. prevail, because the city government would be strictly liable for failing to ensure the water main repair work was done properly.
  5. not prevail, as the municipal water department had no control over the actions of the driver or the other motorist.
  6. not prevail, because sovereign immunity attaches to functions that are governmental in nature.
  7. prevail, because the construction company failed to adequately warn the public of the hazard.
  8. not prevail, because the accident was caused by the actions of another motorist, not the municipal water department.
  9. prevail, because sovereign immunity would not attach to non-delegable duties, which are proprietary in nature.
  10. prevail, because the municipal water department failed to ensure that the construction company had put adequate safety measures in place.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1515
task_id
a4a4c81c-e605-51c6-9d7f-eaac72edd3ab
task_key
default--test--1515
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import