benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1526 / A collector owned a rare 16th-century tapestry. The collector contracted in…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A collector owned a rare 16th-century tapestry. The collector contracted in writing to sell the tapestry to a tapestry dealer for $100,000. The contract stipulated that delivery would be "F. O. B. at the dealer's shop," with payment to be made one week after tender. When the dealer received the tapestry, he noticed that it had been damaged in transit. The dealer immediately contacted the collector and notified him that he was rejecting the tapestry because it had ripped apart and was becoming unwoven. The collector told the dealer that he would get back to him with re-shipping instructions. The collector did not make any further contact with the dealer. After four weeks, the dealer then sold the tapestry to a buyer for $120,000. If the collector sues the dealer for damages, the collector should recover
Plain-text mathematical notation (without MathML)
A collector owned a rare 16th-century tapestry. The collector contracted in writing to sell the tapestry to a tapestry dealer for $100,000. The contract stipulated that delivery would be "F. O. B. at the dealer's shop," with payment to be made one week after tender. When the dealer received the tapestry, he noticed that it had been damaged in transit. The dealer immediately contacted the collector and notified him that he was rejecting the tapestry because it had ripped apart and was becoming unwoven. The collector told the dealer that he would get back to him with re-shipping instructions. The collector did not make any further contact with the dealer. After four weeks, the dealer then sold the tapestry to a buyer for $120,000. If the collector sues the dealer for damages, the collector should recover
Original LaTeX notation
A collector owned a rare 16th-century tapestry. The collector contracted in writing to sell the tapestry to a tapestry dealer for $100,000. The contract stipulated that delivery would be "F. O. B. at the dealer's shop," with payment to be made one week after tender. When the dealer received the tapestry, he noticed that it had been damaged in transit. The dealer immediately contacted the collector and notified him that he was rejecting the tapestry because it had ripped apart and was becoming unwoven. The collector told the dealer that he would get back to him with re-shipping instructions. The collector did not make any further contact with the dealer. After four weeks, the dealer then sold the tapestry to a buyer for $120,000. If the collector sues the dealer for damages, the collector should recover

category

law

options

  1. $20,000, which covers the difference between the contract price and the sale price.
  2. $110,000, which includes a 10% penalty on the resale.
  3. $100,000, which is the contract price.
  4. $120,000, which is the resale price.
  5. Nothing, because the dealer acted within his rights after the collector failed to respond.
  6. $100,000, because the dealer is entitled to the contract price.
  7. $20,000, for the loss of potential profit due to the damaged tapestry.
  8. $120,000, for conversion.
  9. $108,000, because the dealer is entitled to a reasonable sum not exceeding 10% on the resale.
  10. $130,000, including the contract price and a penalty for unauthorized resale.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1526
task_id
a773dd27-9c0e-5810-8bad-0ed45a20bf55
task_key
default--test--1526
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import