benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1528 / A man worked as a clerk in a gourmet coffee shop. His friend often stopped by…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A man worked as a clerk in a gourmet coffee shop. His friend often stopped by the shop to chat with the man while the man was working. One afternoon, while the friend was visiting the shop, the man needed to use the bathroom. There were no customers in the shop at that moment, so the man asked the friend to watch the store for him while he went in the back to use the bathroom. The friend agreed to do so. While the man was in the bathroom, a customer came into the store. She wanted to purchase some freshly ground coffee. The shop had a grinding machine that customers could use. The customer selected a bag of coffee beans and then took it to the grinding machine. She was unsure how to start the machine, so she asked the friend for help. The friend tried to show the customer how to use the machine, but he was not familiar with how it worked, and he gave the customer erroneous instructions. The customer tried to follow the friend's instructions, but this led to her getting her finger pinched and cut by the machine. If the customer asserts a claim against the coffee shop company for her finger injury, the customer will most likely

category

law

options

  1. prevail, because the company should have had a warning sign about the dangers of the machine.
  2. not prevail, because the company is not liable for the friend's negligence.
  3. prevail, because the company would be vicariously liable for the man's unauthorized actions.
  4. not prevail, because the customer should have waited for an employee to operate the machine.
  5. not prevail, because the friend was acting as a Good Samaritan.
  6. not prevail, because the man acted outside the scope of employment by entrusting the supervision of the shop to his friend.
  7. prevail, because the company failed to properly train the man on how to operate the machine.
  8. not prevail, because the friend was not an employee of the coffee shop.
  9. prevail, because the company failed to ensure that the man was never left alone in the shop.
  10. prevail, because the friend's negligence would be imputed to the company.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1528
task_id
7d1ba0f3-9334-5d49-8757-c9a0e404a190
task_key
default--test--1528
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import