benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1572 / Hart argues that secondary rules are 'power-conferring' but this seems…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

Hart argues that secondary rules are 'power-conferring' but this seems unconvincing in the case of the rule of recognition because:

category

law

options

  1. It is not a social rule.
  2. It both confers power and imposes duties on judges to decide cases.
  3. It is a primary rule, not a secondary rule.
  4. It is applicable only in the case of federal constitutions.
  5. It fails to specify the source of authority.
  6. It does not confer power but only recognizes it.
  7. It applies only in the case of unitary constitutions.
  8. It is more of a procedural rule than a power-conferring rule.
  9. It only imposes duties on judges without conferring power.
  10. It confers power on the legislature, not the judiciary.

src

ori_mmlu-jurisprudence

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1572
task_id
1143c80e-fc15-59a0-9b7e-558fb644dbd1
task_key
default--test--1572
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import