benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1577 / Should treaties assume a particular form?

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

Should treaties assume a particular form?

category

law

options

  1. Treaties do not need to be designated as such, but must always assume a particular form
  2. Treaties should always be written in legal language, regardless of their form
  3. Treaties should always assume a particular form, no matter how they are designated
  4. Treaties should always be designated as such, but do not need to assume a particular form
  5. Treaties do not have to assume a particular form or designated as such
  6. Treaties should not be designated as such, and do not need to assume a particular form
  7. Treaties do not need to be designated or assume a particular form, but must always be ratified by the legislative body
  8. Treaties have to be designated as such, no matter what form they assume
  9. Treaties should always be designated as such and assume a particular form
  10. Treaties can assume any form, but must always be signed by the heads of states

src

ori_mmlu-international_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import