benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1623 / A defendant was arrested and charged with burglarizing a home. At trial, the…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A defendant was arrested and charged with burglarizing a home. At trial, the main issue of contention centered on the identity of the burglar. The state called the homeowner to testify, but his identification testimony was inconclusive. The homeowner testified that he was asleep during the burglary and awoke as the burglar was fleeing the premises. The homeowner admitted that he didn't see the face of the burglar and couldn't even tell whether the person was male or female. Thereafter, the prosecution offers evidence that at the time of the burglary, the defendant needed money to defend himself against other burglary charges. This proffered evidence should be

category

law

options

  1. excluded, as it distracts from the main issue of identifying the burglar.
  2. admitted as it shows the defendant's potential desperation.
  3. excluded as it does not provide direct evidence of the defendant's involvement in the crime.
  4. admitted without restriction as probative evidence of motive.
  5. excluded as substantially more unfairly prejudicial than probative.
  6. excluded as it could lead to bias against the defendant.
  7. excluded as lacking any probative value.
  8. admitted, but with a cautionary instruction from the judge to the jury to consider the evidence carefully.
  9. admitted, provided the court instructs the jury to limit use of the evidence to the defendant's motive to burglarize.
  10. admitted, provided the court instructs the jury to consider the defendant's financial status.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1623
task_id
91da6fe4-acf6-56cb-b03f-edbd83233812
task_key
default--test--1623
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import