benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1670 / A 17-year-old boy was jostling with his 12-year-old brother. A pedestrian…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A 17-year-old boy was jostling with his 12-year-old brother. A pedestrian witnessed the boy shoving his brother and mistakenly believed that they were fighting. Acting as a Good Samaritan, the pedestrian approached the boys and tried to intercede. The boy stumbled and accidentally fell into the pedestrian, knocking him to the ground. The pedestrian broke his arm as a result of the fall. If the pedestrian sues the boy to recover damages for his injury, he should

category

law

options

  1. prevail, because the pedestrian reasonably believed that the boy was about to injure his brother.
  2. prevail, based upon the doctrine of transferred intent.
  3. not prevail, because the pedestrian assumed the risk.
  4. not prevail, unless the boy was negligent.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import