benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1702 / Albert Attorney was a solo practitioner in Littletown who operated a general law…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

Albert Attorney was a solo practitioner in Littletown who operated a general law practice. In 1990, Albert drafted a document for a client's estate plan that unfortunately violated the rule against perpetuities. Upon the testator's death in 2004, the mistake was discovered. Because of the error, the estate plan was not admitted to probate so the assets were distributed under the state intestacy statute. Gordon Greedy was named as a substantial taker under the estate plan, but did not take under the intestate statute since he was not a relative. The state statute of limitations for professional malpractice is three years. If Gordon sues Albert for professional malpractice in 2005, the best defense Albert can assert is

category

law

options

  1. Albert did not intentionally make the mistake in the estate plan.
  2. The statute of limitations has run, so Gordon's lawsuit is not timely.
  3. Gordon was not an eligible taker under the estate plan.
  4. The error in the estate plan was due to a change in legislation.
  5. The rule against perpetuities is too complicated for the average lawyer in the locality of Littletown to understand.
  6. Albert Attorney was not practicing at the time of the testator's death.
  7. Albert was not aware of the mistake until the testator's death.
  8. The legal fee for the original estate plan was never paid.
  9. Gordon Greedy was not a direct client of Albert Attorney.
  10. Gordon Greedy was not a relative and therefore cannot sue for professional malpractice.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1702
task_id
a89829cc-5b82-5c38-ac6b-c765b653da06
task_key
default--test--1702
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import