benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1760 / In what way is Responsibility to Protect (R2P) different from humanitarian…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

In what way is Responsibility to Protect (R2P) different from humanitarian intervention?

category

law

options

  1. R2P is less arbitrary because it requires some UNSC input and its primary objective is to avert a humanitarian crisis
  2. R2P always involves economic sanctions, whereas humanitarian intervention does not
  3. R2P is essentially the same as humanitarian intervention
  4. R2P requires a call for assistance by the State in distress
  5. R2P always involves armed force, whereas humanitarian intervention does not
  6. Humanitarian intervention is essentially the same as R2P
  7. Humanitarian intervention always requires UNSC approval while R2P does not
  8. Humanitarian intervention requires a call for assistance by the State in distress while R2P does not
  9. R2P is more arbitrary because it does not require UNSC input
  10. R2P is a broader concept that includes economic sanctions, whereas humanitarian intervention is strictly military

src

ori_mmlu-international_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import