benchmarks.wiki

benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 1808 / The President appointed a delegation to enter into negotiations with…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

The President appointed a delegation to enter into negotiations with representatives of a foreign government to study the problem of preventing the extinction of certain species of rabbits. The delegation's goal was twofold: to study the problem and to formulate regulations in a bilateral agreement that would protect the endangered species and provide for a permanent commission that would continually monitor enforcement of the proposed regulations. After compiling their findings and drafting the necessary regulations, the President and the leader of the foreign government entered into a treaty to form a permanent commission to oversee the problem and to grant it the necessary enforcement powers. Assume that after the treaty goes into effect, a state legislature enacts a statute that provides that "any licensed rabbit-hunter in the state and its surrounding environs may increase his monthly catch of rabbits from 10 to 15 in each of the specified months of the authorized rabbit-hunting season from the first day of October until the last day of February. " If challenged, the enactment of the aforementioned statute would most likely be declared

category

law

options

  1. constitutional, because the enactment falls within the Tenth Amendment's reservedpowers.
  2. unconstitutional, because all treaties are the supreme law of the land.
  3. unconstitutional, because it conflicts with federal law.
  4. constitutional, because the treaty does not specifically prohibit the increase in hunting.
  5. constitutional, because the treaty only applies to the federal government.
  6. constitutional, because the regulation of hunting is within the area of state action.
  7. constitutional, because the state has the right to regulate its own natural resources.
  8. unconstitutional, because it violates the commerce clause.
  9. unconstitutional, because it interferes with international relations.

src

ori_mmlu-professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

upstream_id / Original problem ID
1808
task_id
bd481dab-0360-56f1-a507-852e1aec6ab5
task_key
default--test--1808
task_revision_id
1
config / split
default / test

Official source

initial import